The Eastport-Lubec area has
been selected as Maine's best potential location for a tidal
power demonstration project using underwater turbine technology
that depends on the free flow of the tides rather than dams.
The selection signals that the area will be further evaluated
as part of a feasibility study. It is the first of numerous
steps to be completed before a project can be approved.
A study team C managed by
the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) in Palo Alto,
California, and supported by funding from the Maine Technology
Institute C identified and conducted a preliminary evaluation
of 40 potential sites along Maine's coast this summer. The
40 sites were subsequently reduced to 10 finalists, each
of which was visited and evaluated by members of the study
team in late August.
The selection of the Eastport-Lubec
area as the prime location for a Maine project is part of
EPRI's process to target potential sites in the states of
California, Maine, Massachusetts and Washington, as well
as the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, New Brunswick
and Nova Scotia. Depending on the outcome of the ongoing
process, pilot projects could be located at some or all
of the seven targeted sites. Partners in the project are
the provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, the states
of Maine, Massachusetts, Alaska and Washington and the U.S.
Department of Energy and the City of San Francisco.
"This confirms the extraordinary
quality of our natural resource, and its potential for increasing
energy self-reliance," says Bob Judd, a part-time Lubec
resident, member of the lead advisory team for the EPRI
project, and key advocate of the Lubec and Eastport sites.
"In a way, this maritime coast from Nova Scotia to
part way down the coast of Maine is a bit like the Saudi
Arabia of tidal power."
"The technology to make
use of this resource sensibly is nearing," he adds,
noting that ocean energy is now recognized, in the new U.S.
energy legislation, as a qualified renewable resource, along
with wind, solar, biomass and small hydro-electric dams.
Certain incentives are now in place to look at tidal power
as a source for domestic energy production. "It's about
where wind energy was a decade ago," Judd notes. In
1980, wind power generated no significant amount of energy
in the U.S., but now over 6,700 megawatts are produced.
New technology for harnessing
tidal energy does not use containment dams. Instead, underwater
turbines are either anchored to the sea floor, attached
to driven piles or suspended from a floating structure that's
anchored.
Although proponents of tidal
energy will be sensitive to concerns about navigation and
the fisheries, Judd adds that they "want to develop
the momentum to see if the promise of this technology can
help with energy independence." Two scales are envisioned
for tidal power C a commercial operation that would produce
a significant amount of megawatts that would be passed into
the power grid, and smaller scale projects that would provide
power for perhaps a local manufacturing facility.
"We have successfully
taken the first step in a process that has the potential
to serve our area and make it a model for homegrown electricity.
It is a good start, but many steps remain in the process
and this preliminary step does not yet guarantee the final
siting of the project," Judd says.
Maine's advisors on the project,
in consultation with study team consultants, selected Eastport
and Lubec as the state's strongest candidate sites. Extensive
modeling of the area's tidal flow, done by Texas A&M
Oceanography Professor David Brooks, an Eastport native,
was pivotal to the selection.
In addition to the quality
of the tidal flow, project advisors were impressed with
the skills available in the local area, the proximity of
shoreside support resources, the potential for international
collaboration with New Brunswick, and the receptivity demonstrated
by local leaders at an August 26 meeting in Lubec with Judd
and site selection consultant Dr. George Hagerman of Virginia
Tech.
Among those participating
in the Lubec meeting were Maine Senator Kevin Raye, Andrew
Varisco of U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe's office, Carol Woodcock
of U.S. Senator Susan Collins' office, Lubec Selectman Bill
Daye, Eastport City Manager George Finch, and Lubec Town
Administrator Maureen Glidden. Also taking part were Capt.
Bob Peacock, Lubec Harbormaster Davis Pike, Kathy Billings
of Bangor-Hydro, Will Hopkins of the Cobscook Bay Resource
Center, Michael Mayhew of the Maine PUC, Michael Szemerda
of Cooke Aquaculture, and Lubec residents Harold Bailey,
Peter Boyce and Dick Hoyt.
Hopkins comments, "It's
all about location and the specific technology that they
settle on. There are different approaches, and we don't
know if any are suited to this part of the world. We certainly
hope that as part of the project they will monitor the effect
on fish and marine mammal populations."
He adds, "This
does seem to be an appropriate scale technology. Potentially
the people of this area could be in on the ground floor."
Following the meeting, Peacock
took Hagerman, Raye and others on a tour of potential sites.
Raye indicated to Hagerman his support for the local sites,
and subsequently contacted Beth Nagusky, Maine's director
of energy independence, urging that the Eastport-Lubec area
be selected. Raye noted that the area's powerful tides,
strong local interest, and history as home of the former
Passamaquoddy Dam tidal power project combine to make it
an ideal location to test a turbine generating system. Raye
also noted his belief that the project offers potential
for increasing economic activity in Washington County.
Specifically, consultants
report that waters between Dog Island and Clark's Ledge
in Eastport appear to have the highest potential for larger
scale power generation. Waters near Shackford Head in Eastport
were also deemed attractive but have some limitations. The
Lubec Narrows ranked high because of its extremely powerful
tidal flow but lacks the water depth at low tide required
to accommodate larger-scale generation systems. Those close
to the project indicate there is a good possibility that
the Lubec Narrows could become the site of a 500-kilowatt
pilot "prototype" project.
If the technology proves successful
after a 12-24 month test, project management hopes for a
larger commercial project in the 10 megawatt range, likely
at Eastport, in the future. A 10-megawatt generation system
would generate enough electricity to serve the needs of
7,000-8,000 typical households. As envisioned, the projects
would be owned by developers who would finance the purchase,
installation and operation of the generation systems. They
would recoup their costs and earn a profit by selling the
electricity into the existing electrical distribution grid.
A more detailed study will
be undertaken, with results expected in early May 2006.
This analysis will address a number of questions, including
the projected cost of electricity generated from tidal power.
The next step will be to select
the best technology for the potential Maine site. Of eight
companies identified by the study team as designing and
manufacturing tidal power generation systems, three that
appear to have products most suitable to the area have been
selected for further review. One will be selected for the
detailed economic and environmental and regulatory analysis
that will take place over the next six months.
"Now we need to keep
this pioneering project alive and nurture it with care and
clear thinking. It could turn out to be something special
right in our backyard," Judd observes.
|